Archive for March, 2012

Behavioral Economists Challenge Outcomes-Based Wellness Incentives

I’ve had to eat so much crow since I started posting on this blog, you’d think I would’ve acquired a taste for it by now. My latest sampling was served up courtesy of behavioral economists and their connection, or lack thereof, to outcomes-based employee health incentives.

In one of my least popular posts ever, Be Afraid: Behavioral Economics and Outcomes-Based Wellness (May 2011), I criticized corporate benefits managers who, I argued, relied on the research of behavioral economists to Read the rest of this entry »

, , , ,

Leave a Comment

Buddy System Trumps Incentives in New Study

A new study that flew under the radar of most wellness professionals may have major implications for our understanding of how to influence health behavior and the role of outcomes-based incentives. Read the rest of this entry »

, , , , ,

1 Comment

Wellness Budgets: ShapeUp Spotlights the One Percent

I nitpicked with ShapeUp for the way they used the term “per employee per year.” It’s only fair that I give them props for introducing a lot of people to one of the best ways to express total employee wellness budget: as a percentage of total health care expense.

In their survey results, ShapeUp reported, “Wellness budgets are typically 1-3% of total health care spend.” Elsewhere Read the rest of this entry »

, ,

1 Comment

Deconstructing the ShapeUp Survey’s Findings about Incentives

According to the ShapeUp Employer Wellness Survey, the average per employee per year incentive is $375.

I’ll take a pass, for now, on discussing the role of incentives in motivating behavior change. That topic is being well covered in all corners of the wellness world.

Let’s take a look at this number, $375. While ShapeUp wrote in its blog, and its webinar debate, that this is the average per employee per year (PEPY) incentive, I suspect that they were being more precise when they stated in their survey results that $375 was Read the rest of this entry »

, , ,

6 Comments

Engagement vs Participation: Shaping Up or Just Showing Up?

Employers cited increased “engagement” as their number one priority when designing wellness offerings, according to ShapeUp’s Employer Wellness Survey. And in their webinar, “Debating the Results of Our Wellness Survey,” ShapeUp noted that respondents had used the terms “engagement” and “participation” interchangeably. Throughout the webinar, ShapeUp chose to follow suit.

For me, this part of the webinar was a roller-coaster ride. I was disappointed Read the rest of this entry »

, , ,

2 Comments

Do Annual Physical Exams Improve Health Outcomes?

In case you missed it, the most recent issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine included an important but disturbing editorial “What We Don’t Know Can Hurt Our Patients” (excerpt here). The editorial piggy-backed on an article describing a study showing that most physicians don’t understand screening statistics.

The discussion got me to thinking about an ongoing LinkedIn forum, to which I’ve previously referred, in which wellness managers are falling in lock-step in support of requiring annual physical exams.

Here, for what it’s worth, is another one of my contributions to that discussion:

According to the US Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, “the US Preventive Services Task Force [in the 2nd edition of its preventive guidelines] has rejected the traditional emphasis on a standardized annual physical examination as an effective tool for improving the health of patients. Instead, they emphasized that the content and the frequency of the periodic health exam needs to be tailored to the age, health risks and preferences of each patient.”
A good overview of the topic, representing both sides, is available on the website of the American College of Physicians.

It’s important to identify how best to motivate employees to be fully engaged in their health and wellness. But first we must, as clearly as possible, identify those behaviors that are truly helpful. As for “annual” preventive exams, the most positive thing you can say is that the jury is still out.

,

Leave a Comment

Zero in on a ShapeUp Obesity Study

I’m stepping aside from the series about the ShapeUp Employer Wellness Survey results to take a knee-deep dive into the obesity study published in the journal Obesity in 2009.

Bottom line: ShapeUp met a standard for excellence by publishing, in a peer-reviewed journal, the positive outcomes generated by it’s social-based wellness platform. The study should be a key consideration for any prospective purchaser who seeks evidence-based solutions (and that should be all of us). But…while the study, despite some limitations, gives ShapeUp the grounds on which to argue, “Anyone serious about controlling behavior-driven health care costs in America would be wise to zero in on weight loss interventions,” those of us in the field should take pause before Read the rest of this entry »

, , ,

2 Comments

Zeroing in on Weight Loss May Be a Bad Idea — The ShapeUp Survey, Pt 3

In one of ShapeUp’s initial posts following the release of the results of its Annual Survey Large Employer Wellness Survey, they emphasized that obesity is a key driver of employer health care costs, and the survey results found that employers view addressing obesity as an important goal.

ShapeUp concluded:

Anyone serious about controlling behavior-driven health care costs in America would be wise to zero in on weight loss interventions aimed at large, self-insured companies.

Anyone?

In fact, employers who invest in weight management are likely to be doing so to excess. Read the rest of this entry »

, ,

Leave a Comment

Intent-to-Treat: It Counts

If you’ve ever conducted an evaluation of your tobacco cessation program, you may be familiar with the distinction between intent-to-treat and responder quit rates. In case you’re not familiar with these terms, read on. Not only will knowledge of these methodologies inform your future evaluations of all your health promotion programs, but it will help you:

  • Identify the interventions that are best to offer your employees.
  • Present outcome data on your program’s interventions — not just tobacco cessation, but interventions for any health risk — in a more credible manner.
  • More readily identify “spin,” when it is applied to the success rate of treatments — for example, weight loss programs — in the lay press and in peer-reviewed journals. Read the rest of this entry »

, , ,

1 Comment

Blogging about the ShapeUp Employer Wellness Survey: Why and How

(This post is second in a series. For the full series, click here).

I don’t want to use this series of blog posts to simply restate what ShapeUp has published on their own blog. If you are interested in the survey — and you should be — I direct your attention to Read the rest of this entry »

,

2 Comments

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,187 other followers